By Tom Tripepi, PRAB Fluid Filtration Technical Director
Note: This article was originally published on Aug. 21, 2023, on pfonline.com.
As operations with surface treatment applications develop strategies to lower costs, meet sustainability goals, and satisfy compliance requirements, on-site process water and wastewater treatment systems are gaining popularity.
However, companies pursuing these enhancements must approach fluid processing improvements systematically to ensure a positive impact on operations. Here are some key steps companies should consider taking to determine the best return on investment.
Because the chemical composition of process waters and wastewaters varies from operation to operation, treatment systems for individual applications often require numerous subsystems to produce an end-to-end solution that meets treatment goals and provides reusable water. Determining exactly what combination of equipment is needed and what ROI will look like begins with an in-depth application feasibility study. Often, equipment providers of waste stream management systems will facilitate a feasibility assessment on behalf of potential customers. The following are steps for a thorough feasibility study:
A total solutions provider of waste stream management equipment will use the data gathered during the testing process to specify a treatment system uniquely suited to meet operational goals. The right combination of equipment can help companies meet zero manifesting goals, comply with federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act requirements and state and local discharge regulations as well as lower operating costs.
For example, rinse water from plating/metal finishing operations creates wastewater that can be reused in rinsing applications and process baths after being treated by a well-designed system. Disposal after treatment also becomes much more efficient. Processes that are typically used to treat and recycle metal finishing/plating rinse water treatment and recycling include:
Automated pH adjustment: This technology removes heavy metals and organic compounds from process water or wastewater. Before discharging the effluent from a water treatment system to a publicly owned treatment works (POTW), a specific pH range must be met for compliance. Higher flow rates usually require continuous pH adjustment, while batch pH adjustment can usually accommodate lower flow rates (less than 10 GPM).
Ultrafiltration: Removes emulsified oils and precipitated metals without chemical additives. The quality of the effluent that ultrafiltration produces is very consistent. Ultrafiltration does not require heat, which helps to keep energy costs low. Also, different membrane configurations can help accommodate floor space considerations.
Reverse osmosis (RO) is often used as a secondary treatment after ultrafiltration to remove dissolved salts, colloidal matter, and suspended matter. The membranes are engineered to allow only one-way flow through the system, so pretreatment is necessary for any RO system.
The permeate (the water that passes through the RO membrane) can be directed back into the application for re-use. The concentrate (the dissolved salts rejected by the RO membrane) can be either sent to the POTW or processed more on-site to reduce the wastewater volume further.
Vacuum evaporation, distillation and crystallization: These processes reduce process water and wastewater volumes and crystallize the concentrate through evaporation. The concentrate can be hauled away, distillate reused and solids disposed of.
Vacuum evaporation is also useful for processing heavily chelated rinse water or precious metal rinse water. The distillate can be reused for rinse water, and the concentrate can be reused in the process bath or further processed to recover the precious metals.
Vacuum evaporation has a distinct advantage over atmospheric evaporation because it can leverage low—or no-cost energy sources to evaporate the liquid. This process is performed under a slight vacuum and at a lower temperature, thus requiring less energy. Recovering waste heat created during processing and using it as a heat source can also lower energy costs.
Process water and wastewater regulatory requirements are expected to continue to escalate amid projections for water shortages and aging infrastructure. Choosing to be proactive about on-site treatment will not only help reduce hazardous waste expenses and associated liabilities risks, but also ensure that a critical resource for daily operations is used as efficiently as possible.
About the Author
Tom Tripepi is the fluid filtration technical director at PRAB. He has decades of experience in cutting fluid and wastewater filtration.