PRAB > News & Knowledge > Blog > R&D Tax Credit -IRS Section 41 – A Lifeline for Metalworking Manufacturers

R&D Tax Credit -IRS Section 41 – A Lifeline for Metalworking Manufacturers

Rising costs and market uncertainty have pressured the U.S. metalworking industry. Tariffs on imported materials have driven up input prices and dampened manufacturing activity, contributing to a recent contraction in the sector (reuters.com). Combined with softer demand and tighter financing, these challenges create an economic downturn for metal fabricators, machine shops, and other metalworking businesses.

IRS R&D Tax Credit for Manufacturers In such times, innovation becomes a key survival strategy. Manufacturers who invest in new processes, product improvements, and automation can cut costs and differentiate themselves – but they need resources to do so. This is where the IRS Section 41 Research & Development R&D Tax Credit (R&D Tax Credit) can serve as a vital lifeline, offsetting innovation costs and helping companies survive and even grow during a downturn.

What Is the Section 41 R&D Tax Credit?

The R&D Tax Credit (Internal Revenue Code §41) is a federal tax incentive designed to reward U.S. companies for investing in innovation. Simply put, it provides a dollar-for-dollar tax reduction for part of the company’s qualified research expenditures (QREs) (thetaxadviser.com). QREs generally include wages paid to employees who conduct or directly support R&D, the cost of supplies used in R&D, and a percentage of contract research expenses (thetaxadviser.com). Unlike a deduction, which only reduces taxable income, a tax credit directly reduces your tax liability, making it highly valuable in preserving cash.

The scope of what counts as “research and development” in manufacturing is much broader than many realize. The IRS expanded the definition of qualifying R&D in 2001, moving away from the stereotype of scientists in lab coats. The modern definition “virtually encompass[es] every manufacturing or technology company in some form”, including everyday process and product improvements on the shop floor (reliableplant.com). Many metalworking companies design new products, improve existing products, or develop better processes daily—often without an R&D lab or a formal R&D budget- to stay competitive (reliableplant.com). These activities may qualify for the credit if they meet the IRS criteria.

The Four-Part Test for “Qualified Research”

Not every improvement or engineering effort will qualify; the IRS has a specific four-part test to define “qualified research” under Section 41. The work must meet all four of these requirements (thetaxadviser.com):

Permitted Purpose (Section 174 Test) – The activity must try to create a new or improved product or process (or technique, formula, invention, or software) that results in increased function, performance, reliability, or quality. At the start, there must be an objective uncertainty about achieving the desired improvement, meaning the information available doesn’t establish a sure method for success (thetaxadviser.com). In IRS terms, the spending must be eligible as research and experimental expenses under Section 174 (i.e. incurred in the experimental or laboratory sense to resolve technical uncertainty).
Technological in Nature – The activity must rely on principles of the physical or biological sciences, engineering, or computer science – in other words, it’s a technical challenge, not a cosmetic or marketing one (thetaxadviser.com). For example, experimenting with welding parameters (an engineering problem) can qualify, but rebranding a product would not.
Business Component – The goal of the research must be to develop a new or improved “business component” for the company, meaning a product, process, software, technique, or formula that the business will use in its operations or intends to sell, lease, or license (thetaxadviser.com). For a metalworking firm, a business component could be a specific fabricated product or a manufacturing process for making that product.
Process of Experimentation – “Substantially all” of the activities must constitute a process of experimentation – a systematic approach of testing and evaluation to overcome technical uncertainties (thetaxadviser.com). This typically involves formulating hypotheses, building and testing prototypes or samples, trying different approaches (trial and error), and analyzing results to see what works. The solution wouldn’t meet this test if it is straightforward or already known. But if your team is iteratively experimenting with variables – e.g., cutting speeds, material compositions, or tooling designs – to achieve a better outcome, that’s a strong indicator of qualifying R&D activity.

Exclusions to the R&D Tax Credit:

Any project that checks all these boxes can potentially earn the R&D credit. Conversely, certain activities are explicitly excluded by law.

Examples:

Research after commercial production begins,
Adaptations of existing products,
Routine quality control, and
Research funded by another party (more on funded research below).

Companies should evaluate their projects against these criteria to ensure eligibility.

Latest IRS Updates and Court Rulings (2024–2025)

The R&D credit landscape continuously evolves, with recent IRS guidance and court decisions clarifying how the credit is claimed and who qualifies. Metalworking manufacturers must stay up-to-date to maximize benefits and comply with the latest rules.

Mandatory R&D Cost Capitalization (Section 174 Changes): A major change that took effect in 2022 under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is that companies can no longer immediately deduct their R&D expenses; instead, Section 174 now requires capitalizing and amortizing those costs over 5 years (15 years for foreign research). This change “significantly impacted many companies” performing development activities (bdo.com), effectively raising the upfront cost of innovation. While this is a separate code section from the credit, you may have higher taxable income in the short term. The R&D tax credit thus becomes even more crucial, as it can help offset the hit of not fully expensing R&D costs in the current year. (Note: Many businesses are lobbying Congress to restore immediate expensing of R&D, but manufacturers must follow the amortization rules until any new law is passed (bdo.com.)
New IRS Reporting Requirements (Form 6765 in 2024): The IRS increasingly scrutinizes R&D credit claims, particularly on amended and original returns. A revised Form 6765 (Credit for Increasing Research Activities) will be used for 2024 tax returns, and it “requires taxpayers to submit significantly more” detailed information about their research activities (pwc.com). The form has a new Section G that breaks down qualified expenses by each business component (project) for which credit is claimed (pwc.com). Taxpayers should be ready to identify their projects and associated costs in much more detail when filing. The final version of the new form (released December 2024) incorporated public feedback, and the IRS intends to make reporting more consistent and help with review (pwc.com). For 2024, completing the detailed Section G may be optional in some instances (as the IRS transitions to the new format), but it signals compliance direction: thorough documentation by project. Manufacturers should involve their engineering team and project managers in this process to capture the data for each R&D project.
Easier Claims on Amended Returns: On the positive side, the IRS has recently relaxed some of the strict documentation requirements for claiming the credit on amended returns. In late 2021, the IRS began requiring taxpayers to submit five specific pieces of information about their research activities when filing for a refund on an amended return. At first, missing info would cause a claim to be rejected. However, after feedback, the IRS introduced a transition period allowing taxpayers 45 days to fix incomplete claims. This transition period was extended through January 10, 2026 (irs.gov), giving companies more leeway to perfect their refund claims if initially deficient. As of June 2024, the IRS no longer requires two particularly burdensome details upfront: the names of every individual involved in the research and the exact information each sought to discover (irs.gov). Taxpayers still must describe the research activities by business component and the total qualified expenses for each year (irs.gov). Still, they won’t need to list every employee and their specific research objective in the claim. This change should make it easier for manufacturers to retroactively claim missed credits as long as they still have a solid project narrative and expense summary.

[Be aware: if audited, the IRS may ask for detailed employee-level documentation (irs.gov), so keep supporting records even if they are not initially submitted.]

Court Rulings on Eligibility: Recent tax court cases underscore critical eligibility issues that manufacturers should note. An important issue is the “funded research” rule – if your research is funded by another person (e.g., a client or the government), you may not get the credit. In a 2024 appellate case, a firm was denied credits because its development work for clients was considered funded by contract – the clients paid for the work despite success, so the firm wasn’t at financial risk (kpmg.com). The IRS and courts look at whether payment is contingent on the success of the research; if you are paid in full no matter what, then effectively, the research is being funded by someone else, and they would be the one eligible for any credit. Metalworking job shops or contract manufacturers should pay attention to contract terms: to claim the credit, ensure you retain substantial rights in the research results and bear the risk of loss if the project fails (millercanfield.com). Another set of cases highlighted the importance of the process of experimentation. In one Tax Court case (National Law Review), an engineering firm’s claim was denied because they couldn’t demonstrate that they genuinely engaged in a process of experimentation to resolve technical uncertainty (millercanfield.com). Their work – designing HVAC and plumbing systems for buildings – was found to be too routine or similar to existing knowledge. The lesson for manufacturers is clear: document your iterative experimentation. If you are trying something new (e.g., a new tooling design or an untested fabrication method), keep records of trial runs, design iterations, and test results. This supports the fact that you faced uncertainty and tackled it through experiments. The IRS has also been challenging overly broad claims for activities like “direct support” of R&D (e.g., if someone is indirectly assisting a research project). They successfully denied credit for some employee time that was inadequately documented as qualified (thetaxadviser.com). To avoid issues, carefully identify which staff are performing, supervising, or directly supporting qualified R&D, and keep timesheets and project records to support those wage allocations.

As of 2024–2025, the R&D credit remains a powerful tool – and it’s here to stay (the credit was made permanent by Congress in 2015). However, IRS oversight is increasing, and court rulings are refining the boundaries. Metalworking manufacturers should leverage the latest guidance: claim what you’re entitled to, but do so with thorough documentation and an understanding of the rules.

Why R&D Tax Credits Matter During a Downturn

When the economy tightens, ramping up research and development might seem counterintuitive. However, using the R&D tax credit strategically can bolster a manufacturer’s financial position in tough times:

Cash Flow and Survival: The R&D credit can put real cash back in your business’s pocket, which is invaluable during a downturn. For example, by filing amended returns for the past open tax years, a manufacturer can potentially receive a refund check from the IRS for tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars, plus interest, within a few months (reliableplant.com). This influx of cash – essentially a reward for work you’ve already done – can be used to pay down debt, cover operating expenses, or invest in needed equipment.

Research and Development Credit can be an Alternate Liquidity Source that Bridges a Financial Gap.

Investing in offsetting rising Costs: Tariffs and supply disruptions have increased raw material prices (steel, aluminum, etc.). (reuters.com) Squeezing margins for manufacturers. One of the few ways to offset higher costs is to improve efficiency – for example, by reducing metal scrap rates, accelerating production cycles, or automating tasks to save labor. These process improvements require upfront investment in development and trials. The R&D credit effectively subsidizes a portion of these improvement projects, lowering the net cost to the company. The credit rewards you for the same efficiency efforts you must undertake to survive the cost pressures. It softens the financial burden of innovation, making it more feasible to pursue productivity gains that can counteract external cost increases.
Avoiding Layoffs and Brain Drain: During downturns, companies often face tough choices like cutting R&D budgets or laying off engineering staff to save money. However, doing so can hurt long-term competitiveness. The R&D credit provides a tax savings on wages of technical staff engaged in innovation (thetaxadviser.com). This reduces the cost of retaining engineers, machinists, or designers on R&D projects. By claiming the credit, a company might afford to keep an R&D team intact, maintaining its talent and momentum. When business picks up again, those companies that sustained their innovation teams will be ahead of the curve with new products/processes ready to capture the market.
Positioning for Growth: Economic slumps don’t last forever. Savvy manufacturers use downtimes to prepare for the next boom. If competitors are cutting back, a manufacturer that continues to innovate can emerge with better offerings and processes, capturing greater market share when demand returns. The R&D credit amplifies this strategy by freeing up cash to reinvest in development. Consider a tool and die manufacturer that uses the credit to fund the development of a new line of precision tooling. By the time the market rebounds, they have a superior product ready, and the credit helped make it possible at a lower cost. In this way, the R&D credit is not just a tax break – it’s a growth enabler that helps companies do more with less.
Accessing the Credit Even with No Income Tax Liability: What if your company faces losses or low profits during the downturn and owes little to no income tax? Traditionally, credits would carry forward to future years (the Section 41 credit can be carried forward for up to 20 years if not used). However, a more immediate benefit for small or startup manufacturers is the ability to apply the R&D credit against payroll taxes. Under the law, a “qualified small business” (generally one with under $5 million gross receipts and within 5 years of its first sales) can elect to use the R&D credit to offset its employer Social Security payroll tax. Recent updates doubled the potential benefit – starting in 2023, eligible companies can apply up to $500,000 per year of R&D credits toward payroll taxes (the first $250k against Social Security and an additional $250k against Medicare tax) (irs.gov). This is a massive boon for newer manufacturing firms or spin-offs that might be investing heavily in R&D but not yet turning a profit. This means that even in a downturn with no taxable income, you can get immediate cashback via reduced payroll tax bills. For example, a robotics integration startup in the metal fabrication space could use its R&D credits to cover quarterly payroll tax payments, preserving cash to pay its engineers and technicians. Well-known companies that don’t qualify for the payroll offset can still use R&D credits to reduce any income tax to zero and carry forward excess credits, ensuring no benefit is lost.

The R&D tax credit can play multiple roles in a downturn: cash infusion, cost offset, jobs saver, and investment accelerator. It rewards the very activities that help metalworking and manufacturing businesses adapt to adversity – making it a critical tool in the playbook for surviving tough economic times.

Qualifying R&D Tax Credit Activities for Metalworking Manufacturers

Manufacturers, metalworking, and fabrication companies engage in many activities that can qualify as R&D – many of which might not be labeled “R&D” at first glance. The key is whether each activity involves a technical challenge and experimentation toward a new or improved outcome. Below are common examples of qualified R&D activities in the metalworking industry, as identified by industry experts (reliableplant.com):

Designing Innovative Fabrication Processes: Developing a new manufacturing process to reduce defects, shrinkage, or waste in metal parts. For instance, you might experiment with different casting or molding techniques to minimize porosity in casting or refine a sheet metal forming process to improve precision. Designing and testing such processes to achieve higher quality or yield meets the R&D criteria when uncertainty and trial-and-error involve (reliableplant.com).
CNC Programming and Machining Optimization: Programming CNC machines for new operations or improving existing cycle times, tolerances, or surface finishes is a classic R&D activity in a machine shop (reliableplant.com). This could involve writing new G-code, implementing 5-axis toolpaths in novel ways, or tweaking feeds, speeds, and tool geometries to resolve chatter or tool wear issues. The uncertainty (best combination of parameters) and the systematic testing of different setups constitute a process of experimentation.
Prototyping and Product Development: Developing and testing metal parts or assembly prototypes is often necessary to meet customer specifications or internal performance goals. Whether you’re a job shop making a first article for a client or a manufacturer creating a new product, activities like CAD design (e.g., SolidWorks), 3D modeling, simulation, and physical prototype testing can be qualified research (reliableplant.com.

The iterative cycle of design–build–test (for example, creating multiple prototype brackets to achieve the required strength at minimal weight) is the kind of experimentation the credit is meant to incentivize.

Tooling and Fixture Design: Manufacturers and Job shops often must design custom tooling, jigs, or fixtures to produce parts efficiently and accurately. If you design a new fixture to hold a complex part during machining and go through several design iterations to get the alignment and stability right, that development work qualifies as R&D (reliableplant.com). Similarly, designing specialized cutting tools or die sets for stamping or extrusion would be eligible, especially if it involves calculations and trials to get the geometry and material right.
Welding Process Development: Developing or improving weld procedures is another area ripe for R&D. For example, figuring out how to weld a new alloy or a tricky joint configuration may require experimenting with different welding techniques (TIG vs. MIG vs. laser), filler materials, or heat treatments. Documenting how you eliminated uncertainty – perhaps by testing various welding parameters and coupon tests until the weld passed X-ray and stress tests – shows a clear process of experimentation (reliableplant.com).
Material and Metallurgy Research: Metal product manufacturers often evaluate alternative materials or metal treatments to enhance product performance or reduce cost. Activities like testing a higher-grade alloy for a part to improve its fatigue life or adding a new heat treatment or coating process and assessing its effect can be qualifying research (reliableplant.com). The uncertainty might be whether the new material meets specs or how it affects machinability. The team is discovering technical information by systematically testing and analyzing the outcomes.
Automation and Integration Projects: Introducing automation or robotics into a metal fabrication process is a complex project usually involving significant experimentation. For example, integrating a robotic welding cell or an automated material handling system isn’t just plug-and-play – engineers must design the cell layout, program the robot, and refine the process through trial runs. Tuning a robotic arm to weld with the same quality as a skilled human welder involves adjusting many variables (angles, travel speed, torch parameters) and solving unforeseen issues (sensor feedback, synchronization with conveyors, etc.). If your team goes through a debugging and optimization process to get an automated system working correctly, that development effort is probably R&D. In fact, developing programs for automated production equipment (like writing the control software for a CNC or PLC system) is explicitly cited as a qualifying activity (sourceadvisors.com).
Process Improvements and Innovation on the Shop Floor: Even without new equipment, metalworkers continuously try to improve their existing production processes. For example, using lean principles to identify inefficiencies and then experimenting with changes to reduce cycle time or scrap can qualify if there’s a technological part (sourceadvisors.com). Maybe you suspect that changing the cooling rate in a forging process might minimize warping. Still, you’re not sure – testing that hypothesis through controlled trials would be R&D. Or if you have a multi-step machining process and try reordering or combining steps to see if it maintains tolerance while saving time, that systematic approach to improvement is R&D if it’s grounded in engineering reasoning and testing.

Embedded R&D is everywhere in engineering and manufacturing companies. From the first-piece inspection and quality assurance tests (which feed back into design tweaks), (reliableplant.com)

Many activities can qualify for the final tweaking of machine code on the line. The critical point is to recognize these projects and document them as research. Create a culture where engineers and shop managers record the experiments they run—what problem they were trying to solve, what alternatives they tried, and what the results were. This helps capture the credit and leads to a knowledge base that allows the company.

Metal fabrication involves cutting and welding, often requiring iterative experimentation to improve quality or efficiency. Even routine tasks—such as optimizing a weld or machining operation—can qualify as R&D if they solve technical uncertainties through trial and error.

How to Claim the R&D Tax Credit: Practical Steps

Taking advantage of the R&D credit requires some upfront effort in documentation and tax filing, but it is well worth the payoff. Here is a step-by-step method for metalworking manufacturers to claim the credit effectively:

Identify Eligible Projects: Review your operations to pinpoint projects or improvements that likely meet the R&D criteria. Gather your engineering team, project managers, and production supervisors to brainstorm what new or improved products or processes have been worked on in the last few years. Look for projects that introduced new capabilities, solved production problems, or met unique customer requirements through engineering efforts. For each project, ask: What was the technical challenge or uncertainty? And what new knowledge or capability resulted? You probably have a qualifying R&D project if you can answer these questions.
Document the Uncertainty and Experimentation: For each potential R&D project, describe the problem briefly and the solution process. What uncertainties did you face initially (e.g., “We weren’t sure how to prevent tool chatter when machining this alloy at high speed”)? And what experimentation did you employ (e.g., “We tested five different tool geometries and varied cutting speed and feed rates until we found a combination that eliminated chatter”)? Include key details such as design drawings, sketches of different concepts, test plans, trial run results, prototype evaluation data, and any iterations made along the way. The goal is to create a project narrative that would “apprise the IRS of the basis of the claim” by showing the qualified purpose and the systematic experimental process (irs.gov). This need not be a novel-worthy write-up – a concise report or slide deck for each project can be enough as long as it hits the main points of uncertainty, experimentation, and technological advancement.
Track Qualified Expenses (QREs): Alongside the qualitative documentation, calculate the expenses related to each R&D project. The primary bucket is usually employee wages. Identify the engineers, machinists, toolmakers, software programmers, etc., who worked on the project. Estimate what percentage of their time (or how many hours) was spent on qualified R&D activities for that project. The wages corresponding to that time will be QREs. Also, tally supply costs are materials and components consumed in the R&D process (for example, metal stock used for prototypes or welding rods and gases used in test welds)—supplies used in the experiments (instead of items sold) count as QREs. If you paid any outside consultants or labs for research (e.g., a metallurgy lab to do material analysis), those contract research costs can count as 65% of the amount paid. Pull together these cost figures for each project. It’s helpful to use a spreadsheet, and if you have many projects, you can aggregate them, but be ready to break it down by project if asked. Remember, only include qualified R&D activities – e.g., the time your engineer spent designing and testing counts, but the time spent on unrelated production support or sales demos for the customer would not count.
Consult Your Tax Advisor (or Expert) to Calculate the Credit: Calculating the credit can be technical, as there are two methods (the Regular Credit and the Alternative Simplified Credit (ASC)) and rules about base years or prior-year research spending. Most companies nowadays use the ASC, which is 14% of the current year QREs above a base amount (50% of the average of the past three years’ QREs). If it’s your first time claiming, effectively, it is 6% to 10% of your QREs, depending on your situation. A tax professional or R&D tax credit consultant can help determine the best calculation. They will run the numbers using your gathered data (wages, supplies, etc.). Fortunately, Form 6765 (the form used to claim the credit) has been updated to be more project-focused, which you’ve already prepared for. You’ll input your total QREs and compute the credit on the form. For 2024 returns, you’ll also attach the new Schedule/Section G detailing the business components (projects) and associated costs, if required (pwc.com). Ensure you make any special elections if needed – for example, the Section 280C(c)(3) election to take a reduced credit instead of lowering your deductible expenses (this is usually beneficial to avoid amending your Section 174 amortization amounts). Again, a knowledgeable advisor can guide you through these choices.
File the Forms and Claim It: Include Form 6765 with your timely filed tax return for the year. If you’re claiming the credit for the first time for a past year, you must file an amended tax return for that year (and as discussed, include the required project info as per the IRS guidelines for refund claims). You can amend returns for the last three open tax years to claim credits you missed (reliableplant.com). For example, in 2025, you could still amend 2022, 2021, and 2020 returns (if within three years of filing) to retroactively claim R&D credits for those years. The IRS allows this, and you’ll get the refund with interest once it is processed (reliableplant.com). It’s a one-time opportunity to recoup missed credits if you weren’t aware of them. In the future, plan to claim the credit each year on the original return to maximize cash flow.
Elect the Payroll Tax Offset if Eligible: If you qualify as a small/new business for the payroll tax credit, fill out the election on Form 6765 (Section D) and file Form 8974 with your quarterly payroll tax returns. This will trigger the IRS to apply the credit against your payroll liabilities. Given the new higher $500,000 limit (irs.gov), this can cover substantial wages. Coordinate with whoever handles your income taxes and your payroll department or provider to ensure the credit is applied correctly. The credit will offset the employer’s Social Security tax in the first calendar quarter after you file your tax return claiming the election (irs.gov). If the credit amount is larger than your Social Security tax for the quarter, any excess can now roll over to offset Medicare tax as well (irs.gov), thanks to the changes in the Inflation Reduction Act. This means potentially zero payroll tax outflow until the credit is used up, which is a direct cash savings.
Maintain Proper Documentation: After claiming, be prepared to defend your credit in the event of an IRS audit or inquiry. Keep the project descriptions, technical reports, timesheets, and cost summary spreadsheets organized by year. The IRS generally has up to three years to audit a claim. Given the IRS’s increased focus on R&D credits, they may ask for supporting evidence. You should be in good shape if you’ve done the work upfront (as in steps 2 and 3). Supporting the credit with contemporaneous records of what you did and why is much easier. Also, watch for any further changes in guidance – for example, if the IRS finalizes new rules or Congress makes tweaks to the credit. However, as of 2025, the above process is the state-of-the-art way to claim the R&D credit for a metalworking manufacturer.

In an era of economic uncertainty marked by tariffs, high material costs, and competitive pressures, U.S. metalworking manufacturers must leverage every advantage to survive and thrive. The Section 41 R&D Tax Credit stands out as a powerful and now essential tool to help weather the storm. It rewards the innovative spirit that metalworkers have always brought to their craft – from the welding bay to the CNC mill – by turning technical problem-solving into tangible financial savings.

By staying updated on the latest IRS guidance and court rulings, metal fabricators and machine shops can confidently pursue the credit, knowing where the guardrails are. The recent updates in 2024 and 2025, from streamlined claim requirements to clarified eligibility tests, ultimately aim to make the credit process more transparent and reliable for businesses that truly engage in R&D. Metalworking companies that systematically identify and document their R&D activities are reaping significant benefits: securing critical cash refunds, offsetting their tax bills, and reinvesting in the next round of improvements. These credits can mean the difference between stagnation and growth, between merely coping with challenges and converting challenges into opportunities.

In practical terms, manufacturers, engineering, and metalworking firms that embrace the R&D credit invest in their resilience. The credit subsidizes the trials and experiments that lead to leaner processes, better products, and new capabilities. It enables companies to keep pushing forward with innovation even when the economic tide is against them. And when the tide turns, those investments pay off in spades as the company emerges more competitive than ever.

For any manufacturer in the metalworking arena – whether you specialize in precision machining, sheet metal fabrication, tool and die making, or industrial equipment – now is the time to look inward at the innovation in your engineering department AND on your shop floor. Chances are you’ll find qualifying R&D projects that you’ve been doing all along. Capitalizing on the R&D tax credit can turn those technical achievements into financial strength, fueling your business’s survival and growth in these uncertain times. The R&D credit is a win-win program: it helps your bottom line today while encouraging the ingenuity that will drive the American manufacturing sector forward.

Sources:

Internal Revenue Service – Research Credit Guidance and News, irs.gov
Internal Revenue Code §41 and §174 – Criteria for Qualified Research and Expenditures, thetaxadviser.com

The Tax Adviser (AICPA) – Explanation of R&D Credit Qualified Services and Wages

thetaxadviser.com

Reliable Plant – “Manufacturers’ R&D Tax Credit can help fill credit void” (Metalworking industry examples and benefits) reliableplant.com
Miller Canfield Tax Law Update – Summary of Recent Tax Court R&D Credit Cases (funded research, process of experimentation) millercanfield.com
The National Law Review – The Tax Court Recently Decides Two Research Credit Cases – One Favorable on Funding (Smith) and One Unfavorable on the Four-Part Test (Phoenix Design Group), natlawreview.com
KPMG TaxNewsFlash – Meyer, Borgman & Johnson, Inc. v. Commissioner (8th Cir. 2024) – R&D Credit denied for funded contract research kpmg.com
Reuters – Report on U.S. Manufacturing Downturn and Tariff Impact (April 2025)
Internal Revenue Service – New Form 6765 (Dec 2024) and Instructions Highlights pwc.com
Internal Revenue Service – FAQ on Amended Refund Claims for Research Credit (45-day perfection period through 2025) irs.gov
Internal Revenue Service – Qualified Small Business R&D Payroll Tax Credit (IRC §3111(f)) irs.gov
BDO USA Tax Alert – “Current State of R&D Tax Policy (2024)” (Section 174 amortization impact and compliance) bdo.com
Source Advisors – R&D Credit in Metal Fabrication (Qualified activities and case study) sourceadvisors.com

Legal Disclaimer:

PRAB’s website provides general information, but is not guaranteed to be correct or up to date. The information is not presented as a source of legal or financial advice. You should not rely on statements or representations made within the website, blog, or any externally referenced Internet sites for legal or financial advice. If you need legal or financial advice upon which you intend to rely your legal and/or financial affairs, consult a competent independent attorney or financial consultant.

PRAB, Inc. does not assume any responsibility for actions or non-actions taken by people who have visited this site, and no one shall be entitled to a claim for detrimental reliance on any information provided or expressed.

About the Author

Paul Montgomery is the Marketing Manager at PRAB, Inc., a global manufacturer of engineered metal scrap handling, coolant recycling, and industrial wastewater treatment systems. With more than 30 years of experience across manufacturing, SaaS, custom development, healthcare, and education, he specializes in data-driven marketing that translates plant-floor performance into executive-level financial results. His work centers on total cost of ownership, automation integration, and closed-loop manufacturing strategies that help industrial companies reduce waste, conserve resources, and improve long-term profitability.

R&D Tax Credit -IRS Section 41 – A Lifeline for Metalworking Manufacturers

What Is the Section 41 R&D Tax Credit?